Dismissal During TUPE Transfer
Can you be dismissed during a TUPE transfer? Protection from dismissal when business transfers, automatically unfair dismissal, and your rights under TUPE.
TUPE (Transfer of Undertakings Protection of Employment) provides strong protection against dismissal when businesses change hands.
What Is TUPE?
Transfer of Undertakings
TUPE applies when:
- Business or part of business is sold or transferred
- Service provision changes (outsourcing, insourcing, re-tendering)
- Assets, contracts, employees move to new employer
Core Principle
Employees transfer automatically:
- Same terms and conditions
- Continuous employment preserved
- As if no change occurred
- "Warts and all"
Purpose
Protects employees from:
- Losing jobs due to transfer
- Worsening of terms
- Breaking continuity of service
- Unfair treatment
Automatic Unfair Dismissal
Basic Rule
Dismissal is automatically unfair if:
- Sole or principal reason is the transfer
- Or reason connected to the transfer
Unless:
- There is an ETO reason (see below)
No Qualifying Service
For TUPE dismissals:
- No 2 years' service needed
- Protection from day one
- Compensation uncapped for automatically unfair
- Strong employee protection
What's "Connected to the Transfer"?
Clearly Connected
Dismissals obviously connected:
- "We're being taken over, you're dismissed"
- Dismissed to make business more attractive to buyer
- Dismissed because new employer wants fewer staff
- Dismissed to cut costs before transfer
- Dismissed because terms don't match new employer's
Timing
Suspicious timing suggests connection:
- Dismissed just before transfer
- Dismissed during transfer period
- Dismissed immediately after transfer
- Close proximity creates inference
Burden of Proof
If dismissal close to transfer:
- Burden on employer to prove not connected
- Must show genuine ETO reason
- Or completely unrelated reason
ETO Reasons
What Is ETO?
"Economic, Technical or Organisational reason entailing changes in the workforce"
Three types:
| Type | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Economic | Financial or business reasons requiring workforce changes |
| Technical | Changes to equipment, processes, technology requiring workforce changes |
| Organisational | Changes to structure, management, workflow requiring workforce changes |
"Entailing Changes in the Workforce"
Crucial requirement:
- Must involve changes to workforce
- Numbers or functions of employees
- Job losses or role changes
- Not just harmonization of terms
- Actual headcount or job content changes
Examples of Valid ETO
- Genuine redundancy due to merged roles after transfer
- Restructure requiring fewer staff in combined business
- Different skills needed in new structure
- Relocation making role redundant
NOT ETO
These don't qualify:
- Cutting costs without changing workforce structure
- Harmonizing pay and conditions
- Transfer itself
- New employer preference
- Making business more attractive to buy
When Dismissal May Be Fair
Valid ETO Reason
Dismissal fair if:
- Genuine ETO reason - economic, technical or organisational
- Entails workforce changes - actual changes to roles/numbers
- Fair process - proper consultation and procedure
- Reason is principal reason - not just convenient timing
- Within reasonable responses - proportionate action
Example Fair Dismissals
| Scenario | Why Fair |
|---|---|
| Two businesses merge, duplicate roles genuinely redundant | ETO - genuine redundancy |
| New technology post-transfer, role no longer needed | ETO - technical reason |
| Restructure for efficiency, fewer roles needed | ETO - organisational reason |
Still Needs Fair Process
Even with ETO reason:
- Proper consultation required
- Fair selection if redundancy
- Consider alternatives
- Follow procedure
- Allow appeals
When Dismissal Is Automatically Unfair
Connected to Transfer
Automatically unfair if:
- Dismissed to facilitate transfer
- Terms don't suit new employer
- Cost-cutting before transfer
- New employer wants different structure (without ETO)
- Harmonization of terms
- Transfer itself is reason
Examples Automatically Unfair
| Scenario | Why Automatically Unfair |
|---|---|
| Dismissed week before transfer to reduce headcount | Connected to transfer, not ETO |
| Salary too high for new employer's structure | Cost reason not entailing workforce changes |
| New employer wants own staff | Transfer reason, not ETO |
| Refuse to accept worse terms after transfer | Connected to transfer |
No ETO Defense
If reason doesn't entail workforce changes:
- Cost-cutting alone not enough
- Must be actual job changes
- Harmonization not sufficient
Dismissal Before Transfer
By Old Employer
If dismissed before transfer:
- Protection still applies
- Cannot dismiss to facilitate transfer
- Must have ETO reason or be unrelated
- Timing will be scrutinized
Void Dismissals
In some cases:
- Dismissal may be void
- Employment deemed to transfer anyway
- New employer liable
- Complex legal position
Dismissal After Transfer
By New Employer
If dismissed after transfer:
- Still protected if connected to transfer
- Must show ETO or unrelated reason
- Timing still relevant
- Cannot escape TUPE protection
When Connection Fades
Over time:
- Connection to transfer weakens
- Months or years after, less connected
- But immediate post-transfer dismissals highly suspicious
Refusing to Transfer
Your Right to Object
You can refuse to transfer:
- Must object before transfer
- Employment ends on transfer date
- NOT dismissal
- No unfair dismissal claim
- No redundancy pay
- Clean break
Weighing Up
Consider:
- New employer's reputation
- Terms likely to change
- Job security with new employer
- Alternative employment
- Financial position
Changing Terms After TUPE
Immediate Changes Void
Changes connected to transfer are void:
- Cannot worsen terms because of transfer
- Even if you agree
- Protection for period after transfer
When Changes Permitted
May change terms if:
- Unconnected to transfer
- ETO reason exists
- Genuine business reason later
- You genuinely agree (and not transfer-connected)
Dismissal for Refusing Changes
If you refuse changes after transfer:
- Dismissal automatically unfair if changes connected to transfer
- May be fair if ETO reason or unconnected
- Timing and reason crucial
Information and Consultation
Employer Duties
Old and new employers must:
- Inform employee representatives
- Explain transfer details
- Consult on measures affecting employees
- Provide information in advance
Failure to Inform/Consult
Can claim:
- Protective award (up to 13 weeks' pay)
- If not properly informed/consulted
- Separate from unfair dismissal
Redundancy and TUPE
Genuine Redundancy
If redundancy arises:
- Must be genuine ETO reason
- Fair selection required
- Proper consultation
- Redundancy pay due
- Alternative roles considered
Bumping
Can dismiss different employee:
- Select A for redundancy
- Transfer B instead
- If ETO reason exists
- Fair process essential
Discrimination and TUPE
Protected Characteristics
TUPE doesn't override:
- Equality Act protections
- Cannot use TUPE to discriminate
- Dismissal must not be discriminatory
- Selection criteria must be fair
Constructive Dismissal
Breach During Transfer
If employer breaches contract:
- Significantly worsens terms
- Makes working conditions intolerable
- Despite TUPE protections
May resign and claim:
- Constructive dismissal
- Automatically unfair if connected to transfer
Remedies If Dismissed
Automatic Unfair Dismissal
Can claim:
- Basic award (if 2 years' service, but not needed for claim)
- Compensatory award (no cap if automatically unfair)
- Loss of earnings
- Future loss
- Pension loss
Compensation Higher
Because automatically unfair:
- No £25,000 cap on compensatory award (for TUPE)
- Can be substantial
- Reflects seriousness
Reinstatement/Re-engagement
Can request:
- Return to job (reinstatement)
- Different suitable job (re-engagement)
- Rarely ordered but possible
Practical Scenarios
Scenario 1: Dismissed Before Transfer to Cut Costs
Business being sold, 20 staff dismissed week before to make it more attractive to buyer.
- Connected to transfer
- Not ETO (no workforce changes, just cost-cutting)
- Automatically unfair
- High compensation risk
Scenario 2: Post-Transfer Restructure
After transfer, new employer restructures, genuine merger of roles, redundancies with fair process.
- Genuine ETO
- Fair process followed
- May be fair dismissal
- Redundancy pay due
Scenario 3: Refuse Worse Terms After TUPE
Transfer happens, new employer demands pay cut, you refuse, dismissed.
- Connected to transfer
- Not ETO
- Automatically unfair
- Cannot force worse terms
Scenario 4: Different Employer Standards
New employer has different attendance policy, dismisses for absences that old employer tolerated.
- Must assess if connected to transfer
- If immediate, likely connected
- If months later and fair process, may be unconnected
- Timing crucial
Challenging Dismissal
Grounds
Argue dismissal was:
- Connected to transfer
- No valid ETO reason
- ETO reason doesn't entail workforce changes
- Process unfair
- Discriminatory
- Real reason was transfer
Evidence
Gather:
- Timeline of transfer and dismissal
- Communications about transfer
- Business reasons given
- Comparator treatment
- Consultation documents
- Evidence of ETO or lack thereof
Time Limits
- 3 months less 1 day from dismissal
- ACAS early conciliation first
- Also consider consultation failure claim
Employer Best Practice
If Considering Dismissals
- Ensure genuine ETO reason
- Document business case
- Show workforce changes
- Follow fair process
- Get legal advice
- Expect tribunal scrutiny
During Transfer
- Inform and consult properly
- Don't dismiss to facilitate
- Preserve terms and conditions
- Consider alternatives
- Document everything
Summary
Core Protection
- Cannot dismiss solely because of TUPE transfer
- Dismissal connected to transfer is automatically unfair
- Strong employee protection
- No qualifying service needed
ETO Exception
Dismissal may be fair if:
- Genuine economic, technical or organisational reason
- Entails changes in workforce
- Fair process followed
- Proportionate response
Key Points
- TUPE protects against transfer-related dismissals
- Must be genuine ETO reason or unrelated
- Timing creates inference of connection
- Burden on employer to prove valid reason
- Process must be fair
- Compensation uncapped if automatically unfair
For Employees
- Strong protection during transfers
- Employers need valid ETO reason
- Cannot dismiss for transfer itself
- Cannot worsen terms due to transfer
- Can object to transfer
- Challenge if dismissed
For Employers
- TUPE dismissals very high risk
- Must have genuine ETO reason
- Process must be exemplary
- Get specialist legal advice
- Document everything
- Expect tribunal if dismiss near transfer
TUPE provides robust protection. Dismissals connected to business transfers face intense scrutiny and are automatically unfair unless a genuine ETO reason exists and fair process is followed.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Can I be dismissed during a TUPE transfer?
- Generally no. Dismissal connected to a TUPE transfer is automatically unfair unless it's for an 'economic, technical or organisational reason entailing changes in the workforce' (ETO reason). The transfer itself cannot be the reason for dismissal.
- What happens to my job if the business is sold?
- Under TUPE, your employment automatically transfers to the new employer on the same terms and conditions. Your continuous service is preserved. You cannot be dismissed simply because of the transfer itself.
- Can the new employer change my contract after TUPE?
- Not immediately. Changes to terms connected to the transfer are void. However, after the transfer, changes may be possible if there's an ETO reason or you agree. Any dismissal for refusing changes connected to transfer is automatically unfair.