Employment Appeal Tribunal: Appealing Employment Tribunal Decisions
How to appeal an employment tribunal decision to the EAT. Grounds for appeal, process, time limits, and what to expect.
Unhappy with an employment tribunal decision? You may be able to appeal to the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT). Here's what you need to know.
What Is the EAT?
Role
The Employment Appeal Tribunal:
- Hears appeals from employment tribunals
- Only deals with points of law
- Doesn't rehear evidence
- Can confirm, vary, or overturn decisions
- Can remit cases back to tribunal
Location
- Sits in London (main) and Edinburgh
- Most hearings now remote or hybrid
- Some cases determined on paper
Judges
Presided over by:
- High Court judge (or equivalent)
- Sometimes with lay members
- Some cases heard by judge alone
Grounds for Appeal
Must Be Point of Law
You can only appeal if the tribunal:
- Made an error of law
- Acted unfairly procedurally
- Made a perverse decision
- Gave inadequate reasons
Cannot appeal because:
- You disagree with factual findings
- You think decision was unfair
- New evidence has emerged
Error of Law
Tribunal misunderstood or misapplied legal principles:
- Wrong legal test applied
- Misinterpreted statute
- Failed to follow binding authority
- Wrong burden of proof applied
Procedural Unfairness
Tribunal conducted hearing unfairly:
- Didn't allow you to present case
- Bias or appearance of bias
- Ignored relevant evidence
- Considered irrelevant matters
- Didn't give adequate opportunity to respond
Perversity
Decision no reasonable tribunal could reach:
- Very high threshold
- Rarely succeeds
- Not just "wrong" but "overwhelmingly wrong"
- Facts don't support conclusion
Inadequate Reasons
Judgment doesn't explain:
- Findings on disputed facts
- Legal principles applied
- How conclusion was reached
- Why certain evidence preferred
Time Limits
42 Days
Appeal must be lodged within 42 days of the date:
- Written judgment sent to parties
- Check the date on the judgment
Strict Deadline
The EAT is very strict:
- Extensions rarely granted
- Need exceptional circumstances
- Apply for extension before deadline if possible
Calculating the Deadline
- Start from date judgment sent (not received)
- Count 42 calendar days
- If deadline falls on weekend/bank holiday, next working day
The Appeal Process
Step 1: Notice of Appeal
Submit to EAT:
- Form 1 (Notice of Appeal)
- Copy of tribunal judgment
- Copy of written reasons
- Any relevant orders
Step 2: Sift
EAT judge reviews on paper:
- Full hearing: Arguable grounds proceed
- Preliminary hearing: Borderline cases
- No further action: No arguable point of law
Step 3: If Ruled Out at Sift
Can request:
- Oral hearing before judge
- "Rule 3(10) hearing"
- Last chance to persuade
Step 4: If Proceeds
- Directions issued
- Exchange skeleton arguments
- Bundle prepared
- Full hearing scheduled
Step 5: Full Hearing
- Both parties present arguments
- EAT may ask questions
- Usually half day to full day
- Judgment (sometimes reserved)
Preparing Your Appeal
Identify the Error
Be specific about:
- What the error was
- Where in the judgment
- What law was misapplied
- How it affected outcome
Draft Grounds of Appeal
Structure clearly:
- Each ground separately
- Reference to judgment paragraphs
- Relevant legal authorities
- Explain why it's an error of law
Common Mistakes
Avoid:
- Repeating original arguments
- Attacking factual findings
- Emotional language
- Kitchen-sink approach (too many grounds)
Better:
- Focused legal arguments
- Clear identification of errors
- Supported by authority
- Explain impact on outcome
Skeleton Arguments
What to Include
- Summary of case
- Issues on appeal
- Chronology of relevant events
- Detailed legal argument
- Authorities relied upon
- Conclusion sought
Length
- Typically 10-25 pages
- Concise and focused
- EAT discourages excessive length
When Due
- Usually 14 days before hearing
- Check EAT directions
The Hearing
Format
- Usually 2-3 hours
- Judge may have read papers
- Appellant presents first
- Respondent replies
- Questions from judge
- Appellant may briefly reply
What to Expect
Judge may:
- Indicate preliminary views
- Ask pointed questions
- Focus on key issues
- Give judgment immediately or reserve
Representation
Can be:
- Self-represented (litigant in person)
- Solicitor
- Barrister
- Trade union representative
- Employment consultant
Consider: EAT is technical - legal representation often advisable.
Possible Outcomes
Appeal Allowed
EAT agrees there was error of law.
Then may:
- Substitute decision: EAT makes own decision
- Remit to tribunal: Send back for rehearing (same or different tribunal)
Appeal Dismissed
EAT finds no error of law:
- Original decision stands
- May appeal to Court of Appeal
Partly Allowed
Some grounds succeed, others fail:
- Partial remission
- Varied judgment
Costs
General Rule
EAT doesn't usually award costs.
When Costs Awarded
May order costs if:
- Unreasonable conduct
- Case hopeless from start
- Frivolous appeal
- Non-compliance with orders
Amounts
- Can be substantial
- Usually assessed or agreed
- Consider costs risk before appealing
Cross-Appeals
What Is a Cross-Appeal?
If other side appeals, you can cross-appeal on different grounds.
Purpose
Challenge parts of judgment you lost on, in case main appeal succeeds.
Timing
Must be lodged within:
- 42 days of judgment, OR
- 28 days of receiving Notice of Appeal (whichever later)
After the EAT
Further Appeal
From EAT to Court of Appeal:
- Need permission
- Apply to EAT first
- Then to Court of Appeal if refused
- Only if important point of law or compelling reason
Court of Appeal Process
- More formal
- Higher costs
- Longer timeframes
- Legal representation expected
Practical Considerations
Should You Appeal?
Consider:
- Is there genuine point of law?
- What are chances of success?
- Cost of appeal
- Time and stress
- Potential outcome if successful
Costs-Benefit Analysis
Even if successful:
- May be remitted for rehearing
- Could lose again on facts
- Prolonged uncertainty
- Ongoing legal costs
Settlement
Often sensible to:
- Negotiate during appeal
- Agree compromise
- Avoid further litigation costs
Checklist
Before Appealing
- Identify specific error of law
- Check 42-day deadline
- Obtain judgment and reasons
- Consider legal advice
- Assess chances realistically
- Consider costs risk
Submitting Appeal
- Complete Form 1 correctly
- Attach all required documents
- Clear grounds of appeal
- Submit within deadline
- Keep copy of everything
- Note submission date
Preparing for Hearing
- Skeleton argument on time
- Bundle agreed
- Authorities gathered
- Presentation prepared
- Logistics sorted (travel, tech)
Related answers
Unfair Dismissal UK: What Employers Need to Know
Unfair dismissal claims can cost employers tens of thousands. Learn the 5 fair reasons for dismissal, how to follow a fair procedure, and avoid tribunal claims.
Wrongful Dismissal: Understanding the Difference from Unfair Dismissal
What is wrongful dismissal? How it differs from unfair dismissal, when it applies, compensation, and defending claims.
Preparing for an Employment Tribunal: Employer's Guide
What to expect at an employment tribunal hearing. Preparation, documentation, witnesses, the hearing process, and presenting your case.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What are the grounds for appealing to the EAT?
- You can only appeal on a point of law - not because you disagree with the facts or think the decision was wrong. Points of law include: the tribunal misunderstood or misapplied the law, there was procedural unfairness, the decision was perverse (no reasonable tribunal could have reached it), or there was an error in the tribunal's reasoning.
- How long do I have to appeal to the EAT?
- 42 days from the date the written judgment was sent to you. This is a strict deadline - the EAT rarely extends it. You need to submit a Notice of Appeal with a copy of the tribunal judgment and written reasons.
- Can I appeal if I just think the tribunal got it wrong on the facts?
- Generally no. The EAT doesn't rehear evidence or substitute its own view of the facts. You need to show a legal error. However, a 'perversity' appeal argues no reasonable tribunal could have reached that factual conclusion - but this has a very high threshold and rarely succeeds.